<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple releases new iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trescute.com/blog/2010/01/27/apple-releases-new-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trescute.com/trends/apple-releases-new-ipad/</link>
	<description>Just another Typers.com Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:24:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://trescute.com/trends/apple-releases-new-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 23:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trescute.com/?p=78#comment-68</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no way I would by an iPad!!! It&#039;s nothing more that a giant iPod touch. The same 3 year old technology in a larger more inconvenient package. It&#039;s not that tablets themselves are inconvenient, it&#039;s just that if I&#039;m going to pay for a high priced tablet I would at least like to have certain basic features available to me, like a USB port just to name one. Why pay twice the price for half the features of an average tablet?!? Just to be a part of the &quot;in&quot; crowd!!!

Apple has found a way to monetize on a trendy and sleek look rather than offering a better product and really bothers me how they have the audacity to assume people will buy into there hype. But I guess they were mostly right. Hopefully people will catch on soon and look for better products rather than accept Apple&#039;s lame excuse for a tablet. And what is the deal with no Flash?!? Don&#039;t buy into Steve Jobs&#039; reasoning for the inadequacies of Flash on an iPhone or iPad... most other smart phones support it just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no way I would by an iPad!!! It&#8217;s nothing more that a giant iPod touch. The same 3 year old technology in a larger more inconvenient package. It&#8217;s not that tablets themselves are inconvenient, it&#8217;s just that if I&#8217;m going to pay for a high priced tablet I would at least like to have certain basic features available to me, like a USB port just to name one. Why pay twice the price for half the features of an average tablet?!? Just to be a part of the &#8220;in&#8221; crowd!!!</p>
<p>Apple has found a way to monetize on a trendy and sleek look rather than offering a better product and really bothers me how they have the audacity to assume people will buy into there hype. But I guess they were mostly right. Hopefully people will catch on soon and look for better products rather than accept Apple&#8217;s lame excuse for a tablet. And what is the deal with no Flash?!? Don&#8217;t buy into Steve Jobs&#8217; reasoning for the inadequacies of Flash on an iPhone or iPad&#8230; most other smart phones support it just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
